A man who discovered false statements about himself by Google’s AI Overview will be allowed to sue for defamation, a federal court has ruled.
Read more ‘The only thing that would stop me is jail’: North Carolina man sentenced for grooming Bay Area teen
James Keene — a writer, TV producer and one-time FBI informer — last year claimed he found that queries about himself to Google Search were answered by artificial intelligence responses saying he had killed three women and was serving a life term in prison.
Keene had indeed served prison time; his experience behind bars with a suspected serial killer was the basis of the Apple TV+ miniseries “Black Bird.” But his crime was marijuana-related, and he was released after 17 months.
Keene “repeatedly alerted Google that the AI Overviews could be defamatory,” court documents say; the false statements were allegedly accessible for at least two months. Keene then filed a lawsuit alleging defamation and seeking at least $250 million.
Read more AOC accuses Robert Kraft of trying to censor Macklemore’s free speech at Ed Sheeran concerts
Google sought to dismiss the claim. Among other things, it claimed that AI Overviews are not considered statements of fact and that, as Keene is a “limited public figure,” he would have to “plausibly plead” malice on Google’s part.
The opinion issued Monday by a U.S. District Court in Illinois allowed two of Google’s motions to dismiss and denied two others, stating that Keene may file an amended complaint.
Read more Donald Trump Jr.’s other wedding secret: He got a facelift for oligarch-supported bash